* Re: [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1) [not found] <200205031106.g43B6Mv04822@bitshadow.namesys.com> @ 2002-05-03 11:32 ` Chris Mason 2002-05-03 11:37 ` Oleg Drokin 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Chris Mason @ 2002-05-03 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans Reiser; +Cc: torvalds, linux-kernel, reiserfs-dev On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 07:06, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > You can pull the changes from our public server at > > bk://thebsh.namesys.com/bk/reiser3-linux-2.5 It would be could if we could get rid of the cset excludes. They make the whole thing look a little messy. ttt is not a good changeset comment ;-) -chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1) 2002-05-03 11:32 ` [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1) Chris Mason @ 2002-05-03 11:37 ` Oleg Drokin 2002-05-03 11:53 ` Chris Mason 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Oleg Drokin @ 2002-05-03 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Mason; +Cc: Hans Reiser, torvalds, linux-kernel, reiserfs-dev Hello! On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:32:08AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > It would be could if we could get rid of the cset excludes. They make > the whole thing look a little messy. Any hints on how to do that? > ttt is not a good changeset comment ;-) And ttt was not changeset commet, but one of the checkins comment, I believe. Agreed, I just forgot to change it to something more meaningful at commit time, and do not know how to change it later ;) Bye, Oleg ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1) 2002-05-03 11:37 ` Oleg Drokin @ 2002-05-03 11:53 ` Chris Mason 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Chris Mason @ 2002-05-03 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Oleg Drokin; +Cc: Hans Reiser, torvalds, linux-kernel, reiserfs-dev On Fri, 2002-05-03 at 07:37, Oleg Drokin wrote: > Hello! > > On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 07:32:08AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > > It would be could if we could get rid of the cset excludes. They make > > the whole thing look a little messy. > > Any hints on how to do that? Heh, this time I'll try to form actual coherent sentences. The only way to get rid of the excludes is to export as a patch and redo the bk tree. This is a relatively small set of patches, so I think it's worth it. > > > ttt is not a good changeset comment ;-) > And ttt was not changeset commet, but one of the checkins comment, I believe. Yes, sorry. > > Agreed, I just forgot to change it to something more meaningful at commit time, > and do not know how to change it later ;) bk comments should do the trick. -chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-03 11:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <200205031106.g43B6Mv04822@bitshadow.namesys.com>
2002-05-03 11:32 ` [reiserfs-dev] [PATCH] [BK] ReiserFS cleanups (resend #1) Chris Mason
2002-05-03 11:37 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-05-03 11:53 ` Chris Mason
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox