From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 08:42:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 08:42:04 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:37647 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 4 May 2002 08:42:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 14:42:02 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: Adrian Bunk Cc: NeilBrown , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.13-dj1 Message-ID: <20020504144202.K30500@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Adrian Bunk , NeilBrown , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <20020503185811.GA4846@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 02:29:44PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Just FYI: > drivers/block/umem.c that comes from 2.4 doesn't compile: *nod*, I was just looking at that when going through the -dj2 diff. I think I'm going to drop it, as it needs quite a bit of work to be made 2.5 friendly. -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs