From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 19:20:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 19:20:58 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-07.mv.com ([207.22.10.39]:63751 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 19:20:57 -0400 Message-Id: <200205060022.TAA03703@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: hugang cc: glonnon@ridgerun.com, Pavel Machek , seasons@fornax.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATH] Port software to UML. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 May 2002 21:48:19 +0800." <20020505214819.19cb9a86.gang_hu@soul.com.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 19:22:39 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org gang_hu@soul.com.cn said: > Ther problem in bread. No, the problem is in not understanding UML. UML's state is somewhat more complicated than the state of a native kernel. You also need to recreate the host processes the ptrace relationships between the tracing thread and the other processes open file descriptors and maybe a few other things that aren't coming to mind Jeff