From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 20:23:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 20:23:23 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:43248 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 5 May 2002 20:23:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 17:23:05 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Neil Conway , Andrew Morton Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH, IDE corruption, 2.4.18 Message-ID: <20020506002305.GI2392@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Neil Conway , Andrew Morton , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020505204431.74013.qmail@web21501.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 09:44:31PM +0100, Neil Conway wrote: > Also, does anyone understand why screwing up a DMA transfer results in > the trashing of inodes? Even better, how come this hasn't bitten many > more people? Surely there are lots of people out there with disks and > CDs on the same IDE cable... > > Neil > (PS: I have reproduced the problem on two systems so far.) That seems to be a seperate problem with the block layer and locked buffers or pages (don't remember which). I think a patch was submitted and integrated sometime in 2.4.19-pre. Andrew Morton would know more. Mike