From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:01:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:01:17 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-03.mv.com ([207.22.10.35]:51464 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:01:16 -0400 Message-Id: <200205061703.MAA03089@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: Pavel Machek cc: hugang , glonnon@ridgerun.com, seasons@fornax.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATH] Port software to UML. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 May 2002 17:18:05 +0200." <20020506151805.GD12131@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 12:03:07 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org pavel@suse.cz said: > PS: Jeff, any chance of uml going to 2.5. soon? Any chance of Linus not dropping UML on the floor if I send it to him? > It would be difficult > for me to merge swsusp/uml patches when uml is not in the kernel :-(. Yeah, I know. Sorry. I've been doing 2.4 pretty much exclusively, so the last UML that did 2.5 was 2.5.1-something, so it needs to catch up some. Jeff