From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:25:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:25:41 -0400 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:5067 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 May 2002 18:25:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 00:25:32 +0200 From: "J.A. Magallon" To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Lista Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: Plan for e100-e1000 in mainline Message-ID: <20020506222532.GA3019@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <20020501010828.GA1753@werewolf.able.es> <3CCF796C.5090401@mandrakesoft.com> <20020506111950.A1956@kushida.apsleyroad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Balsa 1.3.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2002.05.06 Jamie Lokier wrote: >Jeff Garzik wrote: >> You can easily copy drivers/net/e100[0] into a 2.4.x kernel, it likely >> compiles without modification. > >It does, except that you need to > #define cpu_relax() rep_nop() >or something very similar. > It is already defined in processor.h (2.4.19-pre8). They build fine for me. -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam1 #1 SMP dom may 5 23:46:04 CEST 2002 i686