From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:59:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:59:06 -0400 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:35019 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:59:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 23:58:59 +0200 From: "J.A. Magallon" To: Thomas Schenk Cc: LKML Subject: Re: Has anyone integrated the e1000 driver into the 2.4.x kernel Message-ID: <20020507215859.GA1728@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <1020801852.26725.23.camel@bagend.origin.ea.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Balsa 1.3.5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2002.05.07 Thomas Schenk wrote: >I am working a project where I need to be able to compile the Intel >e1000 driver into a monolithic kernel, but the readme says that you can >only use the driver as a module. Is there some technical reason why >this driver cannot be compiled into the kernel instead of being used as >a module? > Backported from 2.5: http://giga.cps.unizar.es/~magallon/linux/kernel/intel/ Apply both or you will get some rejects... -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam1 #1 SMP mar may 7 22:23:30 CEST 2002 i686