From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:57:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:57:21 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:8361 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:57:20 -0400 Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 06:45:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020508.064528.27619995.davem@redhat.com> To: dipankar@in.ibm.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockfree rtcache lookup using RCU From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20020508185457.I10505@in.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Dipankar Sarma Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 18:54:57 +0530 A large number of processes of which small sets may look up the same ip address. dst ip addresses change after every 50 packets or so. Is this more realistic ? More like every 4 or 5 packets.