From: Santiago Nullo <sn@softhome.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ACPI and swsusp in 2.4.19pre8-ac1
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 15:31:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020508153103.7df44508.sn@softhome.net> (raw)
There's an ACPI patch for 2.4.18 wich is newer and (in my personall experience) better than the acpi code currently used on the 2.4.19preX-acX series. Is there a reason for keep this code instead of integrate the new code? Is swsusp one of them?
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-08 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-08 18:31 Santiago Nullo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-08 19:26 ACPI and swsusp in 2.4.19pre8-ac1 Grover, Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020508153103.7df44508.sn@softhome.net \
--to=sn@softhome.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox