From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 20:56:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 20:56:12 -0400 Received: from NEVYN.RES.CMU.EDU ([128.2.145.6]:44513 "EHLO nevyn.them.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 20:56:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 20:55:46 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Keith Owens Cc: Alexander.Riesen@synopsys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel Message-ID: <20020509005546.GA14348@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Keith Owens , Alexander.Riesen@synopsys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020508172557.GB1044@riesen-pc.gr05.synopsys.com> <13244.1020903019@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:10:19AM +1000, Keith Owens wrote: > On Wed, 8 May 2002 19:25:57 +0200, > Alex Riesen wrote: > >i've found the reason: the make's stdin was redirected in /dev/null > >(my make is aliased to a program prettifying output). > > Use standard make. Wouldn't you call it a bug anyway if running 'make -f Makefile-2.5 oldconfig < /dev/null' went on to build a kernel? That's pretty surprising behavior. (Not saying that that does happen, but it's how I read Alex's message) -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer