From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 19:53:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 19:53:08 -0400 Received: from harddata.com ([216.123.194.198]:43537 "EHLO mail.harddata.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 May 2002 19:53:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 17:52:56 -0600 From: Michal Jaegermann To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: >12 drives in a RAID? Message-ID: <20020509175256.A31674@mail.harddata.com> In-Reply-To: <20020509161656.G14435@unthought.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:16:56PM +0200, Jakob Østergaard wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 04:11:00PM +0200, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote: > > hi > > > > How can I use more than 12 drives in a RAID config? I need it!!! > > > > Please cc: to me as I'm not on the list(s) > > Yes. > > Back in the "old days" with the old superblocks you couldn't. Hm, the last time I looked a header used by kernels had space for someting like 27 or 29 drives (I do not remember the exact number) but its variant in 'raidtools' sources allowed indeed only 12. Synchronizing those headers to kernel values raised a maximum number of disks in an array quite considerably. Michal