From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com
Cc: chen_xiangping@emc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tcp/ip offload card driver
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 08:07:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020510.080725.94585622.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CDBE34A.8050806@mandrakesoft.com>
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:12:10 -0400
Linux TCP implementation will always be more powerful and more flexible
than any NIC, too. I doubt they have netlink and netfilter on NICs, for
example :)
It has the same problem as proprietary implementations of the BSD
stack, same bugs and same enhancements done N-times instead of once.
Anyone who thinks that having a different TCP implementation on each
different kind of network card installed on your system is sane, would
you please pass it on brotha so I can smoke some of it too! :-)
On a more serious note, it might be at some level considerable (the
maintainence nightmare et al.) if there was some real life
demonstrable performance gain with current systems.
For example, do a SpecWEB run with TUX both using on-chip-TCP and
without, same networking card. Show a demonstrable gain from the
on-chip-TCP implementation. I bet you can't. If you can make such a
claim using a setup that other people could reproduce themselves by
buying your card and running the test, I'll eat all of my words.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-10 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-10 14:48 Tcp/ip offload card driver chen, xiangping
2002-05-10 14:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-10 15:11 ` Pedro M. Rodrigues
2002-05-10 15:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-10 16:59 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-05-11 22:23 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-10 15:31 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-05-10 15:51 ` Nicholas Harring
2002-05-10 15:49 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-10 16:04 ` Nicholas Harring
2002-05-10 16:09 ` Joel Jaeggli
2002-05-12 0:55 ` john slee
2002-05-12 17:36 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2002-05-10 18:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-05-10 16:02 ` Mark Hahn
2002-05-10 15:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-05-10 15:07 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-05-11 1:53 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-05-12 2:56 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-10 17:36 Nivedita Singhvi
[not found] <mailman.1021046154.26338.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-05-10 17:55 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-05-10 17:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-10 18:39 Nivedita Singhvi
2002-05-10 21:43 Woodruff, Robert J
[not found] <mailman.1021067221.3300.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-05-12 2:46 ` Pete Zaitcev
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205121335050.14675-100000@filesrv1.baby-dra gons.com>
2002-05-12 22:26 ` Lincoln Dale
2002-05-13 16:17 Woodruff, Robert J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020510.080725.94585622.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=chen_xiangping@emc.com \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox