From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 May 2002 05:05:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 May 2002 05:05:30 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:3023 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 May 2002 05:05:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:05:14 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Anton Altaparmakov Cc: Andrew Morton , Peter Chubb , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, martin@dalecki.de, neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove 2TB block device limit Message-ID: <20020510090514.GL9183@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <15579.16423.930012.986750@wombat.chubb.wattle.id.au> <5.1.0.14.2.20020510093714.01fa9680@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 10 2002, Anton Altaparmakov wrote: > Why not the even dumber one? Forget FMT_SECTOR_T and always use %Lu and > typecast (unsigned long long)sector_t_variable in the printk. I like that better too, it's what I did in the block layer too. -- Jens Axboe