From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:10:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:10:31 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:59042 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:10:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 16:10:30 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Larry McVoy Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BK problem Message-ID: <20020510161030.D10224@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Larry McVoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200205101725.g4AHPOH05574@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > The set of trees which I know are bad on bkbits are: > > gkernel/main > linus/linux-2.5 > linux-isdn/linux-2.5.export > linuxvm/linus-2.5 > ppc/for-linus-ppc64 These are all fine now. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm