From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S316165AbSEJXVy>; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:21:54 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S316166AbSEJXVx>; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:21:53 -0400
Received: from netmail.netcologne.de ([194.8.194.109]:10769 "EHLO
	netmail.netcologne.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S316165AbSEJXVw>; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:21:52 -0400
Message-Id: <200205102321.AWB23063@netmail.netcologne.de>
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
From: =?iso-8859-15?q?J=F6rg=20Prante?= <joergprante@gmx.de>
Reply-To: joergprante@gmx.de
Organization: Linux jungle 2.4.19-pre8 #4 Don Mai 9 23:37:47 CEST 2002 i686 unknown
To: <rmaureira@alumno.inacap.cl>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] 2.4.19pre8-jp11
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 01:19:39 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1]
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205101815560.25246-100000@alumno.inacap.cl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> Am I missing something or the patch is really broken?

I don't think it is broken, there are many people who did succeed in building 
without reporting broken patches. I use "patch" version 2.5.4, Rik's 
bitkeeper diff's did always work for me. Maybe you should upgrade to a newer 
version of patch.

Thank you and good luck

Jörg