From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 19:11:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020511191118.F1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CDD5570.E7E97205@mvista.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205111034400.2355-100000@home.transmeta.com>
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 10:37:39AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 11 May 2002, george anzinger wrote:
> >
> > So, what to do? For ARM and MIPS we could go back to solution 1:
>
> Why not just put that knowledge in the ARM/MIPS architecture makefile?
>
> ARM already has multiple linker scripts, and it already selects on them
> based on CONFIG options, so I'd much rather just do that straightforward
> kind of thing than play any clever games.
So would I - there will be a config option, so we can just use sed on the
relevant linker script to do the right thing.
--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-11 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-22 15:12 How should we do a 64-bit jiffies? george anzinger
2001-10-23 5:10 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-23 6:05 ` Brian Gerst
2001-10-23 6:23 ` Keith Owens
2001-10-23 8:03 ` george anzinger
2001-10-23 15:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-10-26 20:59 ` george anzinger
[not found] ` <200110231545.f9NFjgg01377@penguin.transmeta.com>
2002-05-10 21:35 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution george anzinger
2002-05-10 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-10 22:36 ` george anzinger
2002-05-10 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-11 0:42 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 george anzinger
2002-05-11 8:29 ` Russell King
2002-05-11 15:01 ` george anzinger
2002-05-11 16:10 ` Russell King
2002-05-11 17:31 ` george anzinger
2002-05-11 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-11 18:11 ` Russell King [this message]
2002-05-11 23:38 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-12 0:01 ` Russell King
2002-05-12 0:31 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-12 8:12 ` george anzinger
[not found] ` <3CDD6DA1.7B259EF1@mvista.com>
[not found] ` <20020511201748.G1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
2002-05-12 8:03 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 (Fix ARM) george anzinger
2002-05-11 16:41 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution take 2 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-13 11:09 ` 64-bit jiffies, a better solution Maciej W. Rozycki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020511191118.F1574@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=george@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox