From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313019AbSELMv5>; Sun, 12 May 2002 08:51:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313083AbSELMv4>; Sun, 12 May 2002 08:51:56 -0400
Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([212.71.160.16]:19719 "EHLO
	louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S313019AbSELMv4>; Sun, 12 May 2002 08:51:56 -0400
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 14:51:51 +0200
From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19pre8-ac2
Message-ID: <20020512125151.GD3749@louise.pinerecords.com>
In-Reply-To: <200205112347.g4BNlUw17368@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i
X-OS: Linux/sparc 2.2.21-rc3-ext3-0.0.7a SMP (up 1 day, 4:41)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> [Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>, May-11 2002, Sat, 19:47 -0400]
>
> Linux 2.4.19pre8-ac2

Alan, do you suppose you could integrate the new backported NTFS code in
-ac at some not-so-distant point in time? I reckon that would be a generally
appreciated decision, as demand of decent NTFS access has existed for
quite a bit of time already and 2.6 will yet take a while to land.

T.