From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 09:19:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 09:19:53 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:52848 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 12 May 2002 09:19:53 -0400 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200205121319.g4CDJm403128@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19pre8-ac2 To: szepe@pinerecords.com (Tomas Szepe) Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 09:19:48 -0400 (EDT) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020512125151.GD3749@louise.pinerecords.com> from "Tomas Szepe" at May 12, 2002 02:51:51 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Alan, do you suppose you could integrate the new backported NTFS code in > -ac at some not-so-distant point in time? I reckon that would be a generally > appreciated decision, as demand of decent NTFS access has existed for > quite a bit of time already and 2.6 will yet take a while to land. I'd rather see it stabilize in 2.5 first