Re: Changelogs on kernel.org

Brian C. Huffman
2002-05-12T05:13:10Z

Generally the defense that "no one else is saying anything" is not a
good one - especially b/c it opens up a huge space for others to agree
with the original argument. And yes, they are illegible.

In fact, I believe that when things originally moved to BK, there was
some discussion that although it was a step in the right direction, it
needed to be cleaned up a little bit.

-Brian

On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 21:09, john slee wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 01:07:09AM +0100, Ian Molton wrote:
> > I dont know who to write to about this, but the changelogs for
> > 2.4.19-pre on kernel.org are COMPLETELY illegible.
>
> you seem to be the only one publicly complaining. go write a procmail
> recipe to fix them up.
>