Re: [OT] Unofficial but Supported Kernel Patches

Dave Jones
2002-05-16T01:44:45Z

On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:56:08PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 09:43:26AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
>
> > it's way better than nothing.) There's buildable docbook documentation in
> > the source tarball that in theory could be blasted to HTML and posted online,
> > and that might be nice to have a standard location for. (If there is one
> > already, I missed it.)
>
> http://kernelnewbies.org/documents/

The pdf's there are somewhat up to date, the html version has fallen
behind quite a bit due to lack of time on my part. Christoph Hellwig
offered to update that, but I believe he's also been quite busy of
late.

In theory it could be mostly automated. The only reason I didn't do it
already was every time I updated it so far, the names of the html
files changed, which meant lots of manual 'cvs add' & 'cvs remove'
operations to kernelnewbies CVS.

iirc, Christoph had a workaround for this problem..

--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs