From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 10:17:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020517081749.GA5621@louise.pinerecords.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3038.1021588938@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205162003360.4117-100000@xanadu.home> <20020517033056.GB4595@louise.pinerecords.com> <200205170807.g4H87OY20686@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
> > > > Third and final attempt. Original sent on May 2, second mail sent on
> > > > May 14, still no response from Linus.
> > >
> > > Linus is a bastard. Did you forget?
> >
> > This is getting ridiculous all right.
> > Linus, what makes you ignore Keith's work?
> >
> > Would you tend to think he's worked on kbuild25 this long
> > to end up having to send a linus-dammit-would-you-have-
> > -a-look-at-last-i'm-not-going-to-keep-asking-forever msg?
>
> People sometimes ignore your messages repeatedly, right?
That's very difficult to find out, you see. :)
> And Linus is _human too_. Why _demand_ him to answer?
> But we can _ask nicely_. :-) I'd put it this way:
I believe Keith did precisely that three times already.
> I want to inform you that lots of folks here
> would like to know what do you think about kbuild25:
> * "I'll merge it soon" or
> * "I'll merge it later, not now" or
> * "I won't merge it because ....." or
> * other?
Reminds me of the form Bender filled in in "the 30% Iron Chef."
If you've seen that episode. (Only it had the "[ ] and this time
I mean it" checkbox as its last entry.)
T.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-17 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-16 22:42 kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Keith Owens
2002-05-17 0:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17 3:30 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 7:55 ` Russell King
2002-05-17 8:42 ` Miles Lane
2002-05-17 13:11 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 13:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17 8:17 ` Tomas Szepe [this message]
2002-05-17 13:39 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17 1:50 ` jeff millar
2002-05-17 2:04 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-17 2:26 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 7:11 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-05-17 15:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17 15:19 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 15:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18 1:39 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18 2:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18 2:19 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18 22:14 ` Drivers.conf and kbuild-2.5 [Was: kbuild 2.5 is ready ...] Sam Ravnborg
2002-05-18 22:35 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-19 10:45 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-05-17 18:19 ` kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Diego Calleja
2002-05-19 15:46 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-17 14:21 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 17:37 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-05-17 18:00 ` Robert Love
2002-05-17 14:56 James Bottomley
2002-05-17 19:51 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 20:09 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 20:25 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18 13:15 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-05-17 20:53 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-17 21:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:16 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-17 22:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:40 ` Larry McVoy
2002-05-18 0:41 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 22:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18 0:38 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 22:59 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 23:14 ` Robert Love
2002-05-18 4:01 ` Horst von Brand
2002-05-18 12:57 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18 5:09 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 5:23 ` David Lang
2002-05-18 13:11 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18 6:05 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 16:50 ` John Weber
2002-05-18 10:25 Mike Galbraith
2002-05-18 17:32 ` Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 18:11 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-18 21:15 ` DervishD
2002-05-20 4:31 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-20 5:09 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-05-20 5:18 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-20 14:29 ` Juan Quintela
2002-05-20 5:11 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-19 10:26 Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020517081749.GA5621@louise.pinerecords.com \
--to=szepe@pinerecords.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox