From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:43:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:43:35 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:37388 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:43:34 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 08:43:27 +0100 From: Russell King To: Daniel Phillips Cc: "Albert D. Cahalan" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Htree directory index for Ext2, updated Message-ID: <20020517084327.A20573@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200205170422.g4H4M5q295551@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 07:18:23AM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > I think you're saying that patch is broken by design. And what's the > standard argument for not fixing it? There are a set of guidelines for generating patches given in the patch 2.5 manpage. I would suggest people go and read them. The section is marked: "NOTES FOR PATCH SENDERS" -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html