From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:56:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:56:00 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([212.18.232.186]:42252 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 17 May 2002 03:56:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 08:55:53 +0100 From: Russell King To: Tomas Szepe Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Message-ID: <20020517085553.B20573@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <3038.1021588938@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <20020517033056.GB4595@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:30:56AM +0200, Tomas Szepe wrote: > Linus, what makes you ignore Keith's work? I'm not going to answer for Linus, except to say that Linus is taking patches to fix and improve the existing kbuild in 2.5. Maybe the right thing to do is to let Linus and others try to fix the existing kbuild, and when/if it doesn't work we have something that does work. -- Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html