public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>,
	Wayne.Brown@altec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:40:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020517154004.I8794@work.bitmover.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020517214247.GA26374@holomorphy.com> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205171707510.26436-100000@chaos.physics.uiowa.edu> <20020517223431.GB26374@holomorphy.com>

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 03:34:31PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 05:16:22PM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote:
> > I suppose you want ccache then. kbuild-2.5 may save two minutes of your
> > one hour build. The current kbuild's problem is not that it recompiles too
> > many files, but rather too few sometimes (in particular with modversions).
> > (And yes, ccache won't work too well if you move your trees around, since 
> > *both* build systems use absolute paths. That needs fixing)
> 
> Hmm. That kind of blows. Well, someone else's problem (or is it?). I'll
> take it for what it can do now and plod along.

In the for what it is worth department, we like ccache here at BitMover and
converted the CVS tree to BK just for fun.

	http://ccache.bkbits.net

-- 
---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-17 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-17 20:53 kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-17 21:42   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:16     ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-17 22:34       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:40         ` Larry McVoy [this message]
2002-05-18  0:41       ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 22:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  0:38 ` Oliver Xymoron
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-19 10:26 Mike Galbraith
2002-05-18 10:25 Mike Galbraith
2002-05-18 17:32 ` Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 18:11   ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-18 21:15   ` DervishD
2002-05-20  4:31   ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-20  5:09     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-05-20  5:18       ` Keith Owens
2002-05-20 14:29       ` Juan Quintela
2002-05-20  5:11     ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18  6:05 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 16:50 ` John Weber
2002-05-18  5:09 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18  5:23 ` David Lang
2002-05-18 13:11 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-17 22:59 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 23:14 ` Robert Love
2002-05-18  4:01 ` Horst von Brand
2002-05-18 12:57 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-17 19:51 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 20:09 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 20:25   ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18 13:15 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-05-17 14:56 James Bottomley
2002-05-17 14:21 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 17:37 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-05-17 18:00   ` Robert Love
2002-05-16 22:42 Keith Owens
2002-05-17  0:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17  3:30   ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17  7:55     ` Russell King
2002-05-17  8:42     ` Miles Lane
2002-05-17 13:11       ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 13:09     ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17  8:17       ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 13:39         ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17  1:50 ` jeff millar
2002-05-17  2:04   ` Keith Owens
2002-05-17  2:26   ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17  7:11 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-05-17 15:13   ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17 15:19     ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 15:42       ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  1:39         ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18  2:11           ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18  2:19             ` Keith Owens
2002-05-17 18:19 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-19 15:46 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020517154004.I8794@work.bitmover.com \
    --to=lm@bitmover.com \
    --cc=Wayne.Brown@altec.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox