From: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
To: Wayne.Brown@altec.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 20:11:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020518181114.GA12062@louise.pinerecords.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86256BBD.00606F38.00@smtpnotes.altec.com>
> Satisfied now? Or did you mean I should have installed kbuild2.5 and found out
> for myself? If I had any interest in using it that would be reasonable. But
> all I wanted was to find out how bad things are going to be after I eventually
> get stuck with it.
'get stuck' is really some good wording here I have to say.
> This is my last post on this subject. There doesn't seem to be anyone here who
> understands the concept of being satisfied with a tool and seeing no need to
> improve it.
The point of most of the ones who angrily replied to your original post was,
I believe, that you're obviously not in a position to make remarks about the
quality of the new build system.
Sorry, but the opinion of someone who complains about having to switch to
"make install" instead of "make oldconfig dep clean bzImage modules" (the
new command even being much simpler for chrissakes) and admits that that's
the only problem they can see, isn't of much value here.
> If I'm not satisfied with something, I'll expend large amounts of time,
> effort and money to achieve even trivial improvements. But if I *am*
> satisfied with something, then I don't want to spend even a trivial amount
> of effort trying to achieve "improvements" that I don't need.
Just a side note:
Why exactly are you upgrading your kernel every time a new release is out,
when you don't have a need to do so? I honestly doubt you're waiting for
a particular fix.
> I don't need the new kbuild. I don't want the new kbuild. But I'm going to be
> stuck with it, and there's nothing I can do to stop it. So for those of you who
> DO want it, why is it such a burden to hear that not everyone thinks the way you
> do?
Man, no offense meant here, but has it ever occurred to you that the clock won't ever
stop and one has to keep learning new things every day? From what you have written
it seems you can be in serious trouble each time your favorite grocery store closes
down and you have to go round one more corner to get your bread and butter.
Tomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-18 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-18 10:25 kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel - take 3 Mike Galbraith
2002-05-18 17:32 ` Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 18:11 ` Tomas Szepe [this message]
2002-05-18 21:15 ` DervishD
2002-05-20 4:31 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-05-20 5:09 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-05-20 5:18 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-20 14:29 ` Juan Quintela
2002-05-20 5:11 ` Keith Owens
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-19 10:26 Mike Galbraith
2002-05-18 6:05 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 16:50 ` John Weber
2002-05-18 5:09 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-18 5:23 ` David Lang
2002-05-18 13:11 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-17 22:59 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 23:14 ` Robert Love
2002-05-18 4:01 ` Horst von Brand
2002-05-18 12:57 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-17 20:53 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-05-17 21:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:16 ` Kai Germaschewski
2002-05-17 22:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-17 22:40 ` Larry McVoy
2002-05-18 0:41 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 22:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18 0:38 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-05-17 19:51 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 20:09 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 20:25 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-18 13:15 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2002-05-17 14:56 James Bottomley
2002-05-17 14:21 Wayne.Brown
2002-05-17 17:37 ` Adam Kropelin
2002-05-17 18:00 ` Robert Love
2002-05-16 22:42 Keith Owens
2002-05-17 0:10 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17 3:30 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 7:55 ` Russell King
2002-05-17 8:42 ` Miles Lane
2002-05-17 13:11 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 13:09 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17 8:17 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 13:39 ` Denis Vlasenko
2002-05-17 1:50 ` jeff millar
2002-05-17 2:04 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-17 2:26 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-17 7:11 ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-05-17 15:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-17 15:19 ` Tomas Szepe
2002-05-17 15:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18 1:39 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-18 2:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2002-05-18 2:19 ` Keith Owens
2002-05-17 18:19 ` Diego Calleja
2002-05-19 15:46 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020518181114.GA12062@louise.pinerecords.com \
--to=szepe@pinerecords.com \
--cc=Wayne.Brown@altec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox