From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 22:30:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 22:30:56 -0400 Received: from pool-151-201-226-101.pitt.east.verizon.net ([151.201.226.101]:8064 "EHLO marta.kurtwerks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 May 2002 22:30:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 22:31:26 -0400 From: Kurt Wall To: Dan Kegel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Status of compiling 2.4 with gcc3.1? Message-ID: <20020520223125.A629@marta> Mail-Followup-To: Kurt Wall , Dan Kegel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3CE960BC.5858E63@ixiacom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Scribbling feverishly on May 20, Dan Kegel managed to emit: > How far from wise is it to compile the 2.4.19-prex > kernel with gcc3.1? Is there a list of known issues? > Only report of trouble I've seen so far is > http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=linux.kernel.5.1.0.14.2.20020515015506.02749780%40pop.cus.cam.ac.uk > and that's just a compile-time fatal error building ntfs. I'm running 2.4.18 built with GCC 3.1 and having no trouble that I've seen. Kurt -- For large values of one, one equals two, for small values of two.