From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
"Vamsi Krishna S." <vamsi_krishna@in.ibm.com>,
Gross Mark <mark.gross@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, r1vamsi@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: PATCH Multithreaded core dumps for the 2.5.17 kernel was ....RE: PATCH Multithreaded core dump support for the 2.5.14 (aO
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:29:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020522182947.A16176@crack.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200205222043.g4MKhsw06808@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <E17AeGS-0002wv-00@the-village.bc.nu>
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:07:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I think that although my tcore_suspend_threads and Pavel's freeze_processes
> > have similar results, I don't think using Pavel's approach for the core dump
> > is a good idea.
>
> Migrating a task to a specific processor is also remarkably related. How does
> it wash out if the suspend thread/freeze process stuff works by migrating
> all the processes to a CPU that doesnt exist ?
I was under the impression that this is exactly how Mark was doing it,
actually. Issues with semaphores aside...
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software Debian Security Team
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-22 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-21 23:08 PATCH Multithreaded core dumps for the 2.5.17 kernel was ....RE: PATCH Multithreaded core dump support for the 2.5.14 (and 15) kernel Gross, Mark
2002-05-22 7:56 ` Vamsi Krishna S.
2002-05-22 14:11 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-22 14:17 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-22 17:43 ` Mark Gross
2002-05-22 19:22 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-23 21:03 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-23 22:27 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-22 22:07 ` PATCH Multithreaded core dumps for the 2.5.17 kernel was ....RE: PATCH Multithreaded core dump support for the 2.5.14 (aO Alan Cox
2002-05-22 23:29 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-05-23 10:07 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-22 23:32 ` PATCH Multithreaded core dumps for the 2.5.17 kernel was ....RE: PATCH Multithreaded core dump support for the 2.5.14 (and 15) kernel Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-22 21:09 ` Mark Gross
2002-05-23 1:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-05-23 13:12 ` Mark Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020522182947.A16176@crack.them.org \
--to=dmj+@andrew.cmu.edu \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
--cc=mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=r1vamsi@in.ibm.com \
--cc=vamsi_krishna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox