From: David Gibson <hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: jt@hpl.hp.com, Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Orinoco Wireless driver bugs in 2.5.17
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:25:17 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020523012517.GM1001@zax> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020522103834.B10921@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <E17Aams-0002Ue-00@the-village.bc.nu>
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 07:24:37PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Alan,
> > Could you be more precise and point out which kernel start
> > failing ?
>
> Certainly in 2.4.18 (and I've seen a pile of other similar reports).
Ah, bugger.
> > If I remember properly my debug session with Alan (that was a
> > long while ago), the COR reset was screwing up the firmware (well, how
> > many time did I told you to not make it mandatory ?).
>
> Long time ago -its been behaving well until fairly recently
>
> > Alan has an old Compaq card (the Intersil PrismII variety, not
> > the new Lucent one) and his firmware is probably not very fresh.
>
> Oldish firmware definitely. The newer driver finds the card registers
> it but fails on all tx/rx and reports no signal and noise of
> 130/150 or so (as opposed to db). Flipping back to the older kernel it
> works happily.
The signal/noise bit is probably a red herring. We have problems with
the reporting of this, but it's mostly cosmetic. I seem to have
confusing and contradictory information about how to interpret the
values the firmware reports.
> Any specific info/debug/traces that would help ?
Specific error messages on Tx/Rx and also the firmware version as
reported on module load would be very helpful.
--
David Gibson | For every complex problem there is a
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au | solution which is simple, neat and
| wrong. -- H.L. Mencken
http://www.ozlabs.org/people/dgibson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-23 1:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-22 17:38 Orinoco Wireless driver bugs in 2.5.17 Jean Tourrilhes
2002-05-22 18:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:17 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2002-05-23 1:27 ` David Gibson
2002-05-23 1:25 ` David Gibson [this message]
2002-05-29 18:40 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-29 17:42 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2002-06-02 23:38 ` David Gibson
2002-06-03 1:08 ` Alan Cox
[not found] <385229951@toto.iv>
2002-05-27 9:27 ` Peter Chubb
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-23 3:21 Erik McKee
2002-05-22 0:06 Peter Chubb
2002-05-22 1:53 ` David Gibson
2002-05-22 13:16 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020523012517.GM1001@zax \
--to=hermes@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox