From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 12:53:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 12:52:59 -0400 Received: from server0051.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.33.61]:3502 "EHLO server0051.freedom2surf.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 23 May 2002 12:52:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 18:01:05 +0100 From: Ian Molton To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC - named loop devices... Message-Id: <20020523180105.141af04b.spyro@armlinux.org> In-Reply-To: <200205211409.g4LE9HY31513@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Organization: The Dragon Roost X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; ) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 21 May 2002 17:11:34 -0200 Denis Vlasenko wrote: > > I was wondering if a solution to this would be to introduce 'named' > > loopback devices. > Have no time to think about this now, but will test any patches - > I want /etc/mtab -> /proc/mounts to become standard practice me too. :-)