From: Christer Weinigel <wingel@acolyte.hack.org>
To: dalecki@evision-ventures.com
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, zaitcev@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.17 /dev/ports
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 23:22:39 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020523212239.EA736F5B@acolyte.hack.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CED438B.6090906@evision-ventures.com> (message from Martin Dalecki on Thu, 23 May 2002 21:31:23 +0200)
Martin Dalecki <dalecki@evision-ventures.com> wrote:
> "I will submitt my dual 8255 PIO ISA card driver from 1.xx days
> immediately for kernel inclusion"
Please do *grin* I will probably have to write a driver for just such
a card (a PC104 card though, but that's just a differenct connector),
so I'd love to have such a driver. And as long as the driver is
self-contained and doesn't mess with other parts of the kernel I can't
see why it shouldn't be included in Linus' tree. The same is IMHO
true about /dev/port, it's rather self-contained and is less than 50
source lines in mem.c. It may be ugly but it's useful for some people.
/Christer
--
"Just how much can I get away with and still go to heaven?"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-23 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1022085725.386.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-05-23 17:07 ` [PATCH] 2.5.17 /dev/ports Pete Zaitcev
2002-05-23 18:05 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-23 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-23 19:31 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-23 21:22 ` Christer Weinigel [this message]
2002-05-23 21:37 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-05-23 20:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-24 5:39 ` Robert Schwebel
2002-05-23 21:29 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-05-22 16:30 James Simmons
2002-05-22 17:25 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 17:39 ` James Simmons
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-21 5:16 Linux-2.5.17 Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 9:05 ` [PATCH] 2.5.17 /dev/ports Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 10:42 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-05-22 9:46 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 10:54 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-22 10:13 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 11:26 ` Russell King
2002-05-22 10:40 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 11:58 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-05-22 12:36 ` Russell King
2002-05-22 13:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 12:31 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 12:44 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 12:32 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 15:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 13:05 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 12:38 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 15:04 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 13:53 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 15:03 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-05-22 15:07 ` Padraig Brady
2002-05-22 14:07 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 15:21 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-22 15:19 ` Dave Jones
2002-05-22 15:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-27 9:04 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-22 14:54 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 15:24 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 15:10 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-22 12:20 ` Ruth Ivimey-Cook
2002-05-23 7:30 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-23 6:44 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-23 8:26 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-22 13:16 ` Padraig Brady
2002-05-22 12:30 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 13:50 ` Sebastian Droege
2002-05-22 13:52 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 13:49 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-22 12:51 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 13:56 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-22 14:58 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 13:49 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 14:42 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-22 13:59 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 13:12 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 14:33 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 13:40 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 13:16 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 14:34 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 16:31 ` James Simmons
2002-05-22 14:12 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-27 9:07 ` Pavel Machek
2002-05-22 15:00 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 14:43 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-22 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 17:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 16:17 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 17:30 ` Russell King
2002-05-22 16:36 ` Martin Dalecki
2002-05-22 17:36 ` Alexander Viro
2002-05-22 17:46 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-26 13:53 ` Riley Williams
2002-05-26 15:28 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2002-05-26 15:39 ` Riley Williams
2002-05-23 10:10 ` Martin Diehl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020523212239.EA736F5B@acolyte.hack.org \
--to=wingel@acolyte.hack.org \
--cc=dalecki@evision-ventures.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).