From: William Jhun <wjhun@ayrnetworks.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible discrepancy regarding streaming DMA mappings in DMA-mapping.txt?
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 13:58:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020524135842.L7205@ayrnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020524104345.J7205@ayrnetworks.com> <20020524.104209.31440798.davem@redhat.com> <20020524133711.K7205@ayrnetworks.com> <20020524.132641.104219414.davem@redhat.com>
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 01:26:41PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> I know what you're trying to do, but I'm going to tell you upfront
> that this will make the existing case much more inefficient than
> it needs to be.
Sorry, I'm not clear on this one. I was first proposing (for the short
term, at least) to not change anything at all: all the existing
implementations of pci_dma_sync_*(..., PCIDMA_TO_DEVICE) already do what
is required: prepare the buffer to be DMAed from by the controller. Most
drivers won't have to deal with this; most network drivers, for example,
do a pci_map_*() on an skb passed down from the stack and subsequently
pci_unmap_*() those buffers once transmitted, thus having no need for
pci_dma_sync_*()... So I don't see how this makes anything else less
efficient...
>
> Please, add a new call to handle your case. Thanks.
Such a call would do what pci_dma_sync_*(..., PCIDMA_TO_DEVICE) already
does (unless that is what you want - to have a new call just for the
sake of clarity...).
Thanks,
William
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-24 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-23 23:24 Possible discrepancy regarding streaming DMA mappings in DMA-mapping.txt? William Jhun
2002-05-24 5:59 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-24 17:43 ` William Jhun
2002-05-24 17:42 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-24 20:37 ` William Jhun
2002-05-24 20:26 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-24 20:58 ` William Jhun [this message]
2002-05-24 20:53 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-24 21:18 ` William Jhun
2002-05-25 3:41 ` [PATCH] Functions to complement pci_dma_sync_{single,sg}(). (was: Re: Possible discrepancy regarding streaming DMA mappings in DMA-mapping.txt?) William Jhun
2002-05-25 23:04 ` [PATCH] Functions to complement pci_dma_sync_{single,sg}() David S. Miller
2002-05-26 7:09 ` [PATCH] DMA-mapping.txt (was Re: [PATCH] Functions to complement pci_dma_sync_{single,sg}().) William Jhun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020524135842.L7205@ayrnetworks.com \
--to=wjhun@ayrnetworks.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox