From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 26 May 2002 04:11:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 26 May 2002 04:11:14 -0400 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:33697 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 26 May 2002 04:11:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 26 May 2002 11:11:08 +0200 From: "J.A. Magallon" To: Alan Cox Cc: Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2.4] [2.5] [i386] Add support for GCC 3.1 -march=pentium{-mmx,3,4} Message-ID: <20020526091108.GA1749@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <1022360474.21238.5.camel@ldb> <20020525233739.GA2022@werewolf.able.es> <1022380785.11859.59.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Balsa 1.3.6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2002.05.26 Alan Cox wrote: >On Sun, 2002-05-26 at 00:37, J.A. Magallon wrote: >> Gcc-3.1 has also a -march=pentium2 specific target, that is not a synomym >> for any other. >> > >Splitting PII from PPro is a good move for another reason. The PPro >requires a locked spin_unlock due to an errata - the PII seems not to. > So I can kill CONFIG_X86_PPRO_FENCE for a PII ? If yes, I will try. -- J.A. Magallon # Let the source be with you... mailto:jamagallon@able.es Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586 Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam4 #1 SMP dom may 26 02:36:58 CEST 2002 i686