From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 06:36:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 06:36:47 -0400 Received: from beth.pinerecords.com ([212.71.161.243]:9735 "EHLO beth.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 06:36:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 08:20:44 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: "David S. Miller" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tcallawa@redhat.com, colin@gibbs.dhs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, aurora-sparc-devel@linuxpower.org Subject: Re: 2.4 SRMMU bug revisited Message-ID: <20020527062044.GA6737@beth.pinerecords.com> In-Reply-To: <20020527092408.GD345@louise.pinerecords.com> <20020527.031732.95158135.davem@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-OS: GNU/Linux 2.4.19-pre8-ac5 X-Architecture: i586 X-Uptime: 10:25 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Tomas Szepe > Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 11:24:08 +0200 > > I can't say I like these fixes much. > > How about contributing some time to figuring out what > the problem is instead of complaining all the time? > > %99 of people with sparc32 problems are totally unwilling (or unable) > to help fix the bugs themselves, they merely whine. It gets a bit > old after a while (which for me amount to roughly 7 years). Sure, I'm willing to try to write the fix if someone takes the time to explain to me what's happening -- I'm quite fluent in C but know nothing about the anatomy of the problem. T.