From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 17:33:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 17:33:05 -0400 Received: from to-velocet.redhat.com ([216.138.202.10]:20986 "EHLO touchme.toronto.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 17:33:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 17:33:06 -0400 From: Benjamin LaHaise To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Memory management in Kernel 2.4.x Message-ID: <20020527173306.C15560@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3CF23893.207@loewe-komp.de> <1022513156.1126.289.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 02:22:22PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Well, if you can't fork a new process because that would push you into > overcommit, then you usually can't actually do anything useful on the > machine. Just use vfork or clone + exec. It's faster and uses less memory. -ben -- "You will be reincarnated as a toad; and you will be much happier."