public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
To: "J.A. Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Lista Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] PentiumPro/II split in x86 config
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 22:29:25 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020528012925.GB20729@conectiva.com.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020527145420.GA6738@werewolf.able.es> <1022520676.11859.294.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020527215911.GC1848@werewolf.able.es>

Em Mon, May 27, 2002 at 11:59:11PM +0200, J.A. Magallon escreveu:
> Opps... typo.
> Yes:
> 
>     { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6,
>       { "Pentium Pro A-step", "Pentium Pro", NULL, "Pentium II (Klamath)",
>         NULL, "Pentium II (Deschutes)", "Mobile Pentium II",
>         "Pentium III (Katmai)", "Pentium III (Coppermine)", NULL,
>         "Pentium III (Cascades)", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL }},
> 
> Corrected patch on the way...

Hi,

	Since you're working on this could I suggest that you use labeled
elements, this gccism make the initialization above way more cleaner, safer and
easy to read :-) This is being used in the kernel in places like the FSes, the
TCP/IP stack and lots of other places.

	We don't need all the NULLs, as uninitialized entries will be zeroed
out by the compiler.

	Here is how it would look like:

--- 1.50/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c	Sat Apr 27 14:47:46 2002
+++ edited/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c	Mon May 27 22:03:35 2002
@@ -2245,15 +2245,34 @@
 /* This table only is used unless init_<vendor>() below doesn't set it; */
 /* in particular, if CPUID levels 0x80000002..4 are supported, this isn't used */
 static struct cpu_model_info cpu_models[] __initdata = {
-	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	4,
-	  { "486 DX-25/33", "486 DX-50", "486 SX", "486 DX/2", "486 SL", 
-	    "486 SX/2", NULL, "486 DX/2-WB", "486 DX/4", "486 DX/4-WB", NULL, 
-	    NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL }},
-	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	5,
-	  { "Pentium 60/66 A-step", "Pentium 60/66", "Pentium 75 - 200",
-	    "OverDrive PODP5V83", "Pentium MMX", NULL, NULL,
-	    "Mobile Pentium 75 - 200", "Mobile Pentium MMX", NULL, NULL, NULL,
-	    NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL }},
+	{
+		vendor:	     X86_VENDOR_INTEL,
+		family:	     4,
+		model_names: {
+				[0] = "486 DX-25/33",
+				[1] = "486 DX-50",
+				[2] = "486 SX",
+				[3] = "486 DX/2",
+				[4] = "486 SL", 
+				[5] = "486 SX/2",
+				[7] = "486 DX/2-WB",
+				[8] = "486 DX/4",
+				[9] = "486 DX/4-WB",
+		},
+	},
+	{
+		vendor:	     X86_VENDOR_INTEL,
+		family:	     5,
+		model_names: {
+				[0] = "Pentium 60/66 A-step",
+				[1] = "Pentium 60/66",
+				[2] = "Pentium 75 - 200",
+				[3] = "OverDrive PODP5V83",
+				[4] = "Pentium MMX",
+				[7] = "Mobile Pentium 75 - 200",
+				[8] = "Mobile Pentium MMX",
+		}
+	},
 	{ X86_VENDOR_INTEL,	6,
 	  { "Pentium Pro A-step", "Pentium Pro", NULL, "Pentium II (Klamath)", 
 	    NULL, "Pentium II (Deschutes)", "Mobile Pentium II",

Best Regards,

- Arnaldo, with the janitor hat on for the time being 8)

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-28  1:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-27 14:54 [PATCH][RFC] PentiumPro/II split in x86 config J.A. Magallon
2002-05-27 17:31 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-27 21:59   ` J.A. Magallon
2002-05-28  1:29     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2002-05-28  2:05       ` Keith Owens
2002-05-28  2:16         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-05-28  2:24           ` Keith Owens
2002-05-28  2:35             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-05-28  2:55             ` Miles Bader
2002-05-28  3:02               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-05-28 14:03                 ` J.A. Magallon
2002-05-28 14:30                   ` Mikael Pettersson
2002-05-28 15:00                     ` David Woodhouse
2002-05-28 18:39                       ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-05-28 16:16                     ` Miles Bader
2002-05-28 14:45                   ` Roland Dreier
2002-05-29  4:23                 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-29  4:27                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-05-29 14:06       ` Dave Jones
2002-05-28  0:15 ` Keith Owens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020528012925.GB20729@conectiva.com.br \
    --to=acme@conectiva.com.br \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox