From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 22:35:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 22:35:21 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:4869 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 27 May 2002 22:35:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 23:35:20 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Keith Owens Cc: Lista Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] PentiumPro/II split in x86 config Message-ID: <20020528023519.GG20729@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Keith Owens , Lista Linux-Kernel In-Reply-To: <20020528021647.GE20729@conectiva.com.br> <3937.1022552654@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:24:14PM +1000, Keith Owens escreveu: > On Mon, 27 May 2002 23:16:47 -0300, > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >Em Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:05:54PM +1000, Keith Owens escreveu: > >> Better still, use the C language standard: > >> > >> .vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL, > > > >oops, gcc accepts that, good to know that this is standard C, but for the > >kernel, I think that this doesn't matter as gcc is the only compiler that > >understands the GCC Language 8) Or am I wrong? I'd love to be... 8) > > The kernel can only be compiled with gcc, but some bits of the build > are compiled and run on the host, using the host compiler. Avoid using > gccisms where there is a standard way of doing it. I see, I was not thinking about those bits of the build, only kernel code, where there are plenty of other gccisms. /me will take a look at the latest C standard... :-) - Arnaldo