From: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
To: Dave Miller <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: 8-CPU (SMP) #s for lockfree rtcache
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:11:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020528171104.D19734@in.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi Dave,
Here are the SMP numbers that you had asked for. They were measured
on an 8-CPU SMP box (PIII Xeon 700 MHz processors, 1MB L2 cache
and 6GB RAM).
The test was as per your suggestion. rt_rcu is a patch that
uses RCU to do lockfree lookup of ipv4 route cache.
The basic test sends a fixed number of packets to random
destination addresses repeating every dest for 5 packets.
We tried two configurations of this test - 8-1-32 where
32 test processes simultaneosly uses 32 different
random seeds to generate different dest addreses and 8-4-8
where 8 sets, each consisting 4 processes all of whom use the same
random seed generating the same dst addresses, send packets
to the dest addresses repeating dest for every 5 packets.
With these basic tests, we measured under several other
conditions - avoid forced neighbor table garbage collection
by increasing the threshold and interval (to 31048576 and
60) and slowing the packet rate by introducing a delay of 2ms
between bursts of 5 packets.
Here are the results in terms of profile counts in
ip_route_output_key() - gc stands for neighbor table garbage
collection adjustment and u2000 stands for 2ms packet
rate delay. All measurements where done based on 2.5.3 kernel.
Test base rtrcu speedup
---- ---- ----- -------
8-1-32 2358 1655 29.8%
8-1-32-gc 4486 2176 51.4%
8-1-32-u2000 2990 1942 35.0%
8-1-32-u2000-gc 4047 2029 49.8%
8-4-8 2870 1965 31.5%
8-4-8-gc 3389 2083 38.5%
8-4-8-u2000 3459 2373 31.3%
8-4-8-u2000-gc 4686 2603 44.4%
Thanks
--
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> http://lse.sourceforge.net
Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore, India.
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-28 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-28 11:41 Dipankar Sarma [this message]
2002-05-28 11:25 ` 8-CPU (SMP) #s for lockfree rtcache David S. Miller
2002-05-28 12:58 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-05-28 12:40 ` David S. Miller
2002-05-28 15:45 ` Andi Kleen
2002-05-28 17:03 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-28 16:34 ` Andi Kleen
2002-05-28 18:10 ` Alan Cox
2002-05-28 17:24 ` Andi Kleen
2002-05-29 4:44 ` Rusty Russell
2002-05-28 15:49 ` Robert Love
2002-05-28 16:25 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-05-28 17:09 ` Dipankar Sarma
2002-05-29 17:44 ` kuznet
2002-06-03 12:08 ` Dipankar Sarma
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-28 19:57 Dipankar Sarma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020528171104.D19734@in.ibm.com \
--to=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox