From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: marcelo@conectiva.com.br
Cc: lmb@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19-pre9
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:23:24 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020529.182324.44462071.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205292123520.9955-100000@freak.distro.conectiva>
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 21:34:23 -0300 (BRT)
> > <davem@nuts.ninka.net> (02/05/06 1.383.11.22)
> > soft-fp fix:
David, Greg, and others, please, more readable changelogs :)
I don't understand what people want in that particular kind
of case. I made software fp emulation fixes, four of them to
be precise. And on the first line I describe in general what
I'm doing, which is soft-fp bug fixes :-)
I do the same thing for a batch of sparc64 fixes, the first
line always is the toplevel description:
sparc64 fixes:
which proceeds the actual details:
- Fix signal blah handling
- Don't bleh during ptrace
- Disable interrupts around foo
- Fix IP checksum calculations when bar
Now tell me what is more appropriate on the first line and
I'll consider it :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-30 1:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-28 22:06 Linux 2.4.19-pre9 Marcelo Tosatti
2002-05-29 5:37 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2002-05-29 6:06 ` Greg KH
2002-05-29 12:50 ` Linux 2.4.19-pre9, still USB freeze Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-05-29 13:55 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-05-29 13:58 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2002-05-29 14:08 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-05-29 17:14 ` Greg KH
2002-06-04 18:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-30 0:34 ` Linux 2.4.19-pre9 Marcelo Tosatti
2002-05-30 1:23 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-05-30 1:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2002-06-04 18:35 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-29 12:02 ` lk-changelog.pl (new version 0.21) vs. Linux 2.4.19-pre9 ChangeLog Matthias Andree
2002-05-29 12:10 ` Linux 2.4.19-pre9 ChangeLog Summary Matthias Andree
2002-05-29 23:25 ` Linux 2.4.19-pre9 J.A. Magallon
2002-05-30 9:35 ` Meelis Roos
2002-06-01 18:47 ` /proc/slab garbage Tom Vier
2002-06-01 19:02 ` Benjamin LaHaise
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020529.182324.44462071.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox