From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 00:53:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 00:53:15 -0400 Received: from 12-224-36-73.client.attbi.com ([12.224.36.73]:65285 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 30 May 2002 00:53:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 21:51:46 -0700 From: Greg KH To: David Weinehall Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: business models [was patent stuff] Message-ID: <20020530045146.GA25213@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <200205281713.KAA22774@freya.yggdrasil.com> <1022610136.4124.131.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20020529234445.O9911@khan.acc.umu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.21 (i586) Reply-By: Thu, 02 May 2002 03:39:18 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 11:44:45PM +0200, David Weinehall wrote: > > An interesting question is whether the licensing terms used for this > patent would pass the DFSG (Debian Free Software Guidelines)?! According to the folks on debian-legal, there's already other portions of the kernel that do not pass those guidelines :) greg k-h