public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Wim Coekaerts <wim.coekaerts@oracle.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"M. Edward Borasky" <znmeb@aracnet.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com, akpm@zip.com.au
Subject: Re: Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed?
Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 22:39:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020531203911.GS1172@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E17AaR0-0002QM-00@the-village.bc.nu> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205221048570.23621-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <20020522203024.GZ2035@holomorphy.com> <384590000.1022102334@flay> <20020528020817.GD21763@nic1-pc.us.oracle.com>

On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 07:08:33PM -0700, Wim Coekaerts wrote:
> running client etc. so it's not just using clone() and done... 

that seems a minor problem, you could still use shm and the "corner
cases" could attach to the shm as usual, but the "core" threads wouldn't
need replication of pagetables to use the shm.

Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2002-05-31 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-05-22  6:51 2.4.19pre*: IO statistics in /proc/partitions corrupt Jochen Suckfuell
2002-05-22 14:00 ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? M. Edward Borasky
2002-05-22 14:08   ` bert hubert
2002-05-22 14:55     ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 15:56       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 16:23         ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 21:46         ` Doug Ledford
2002-05-22 14:36   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 15:44     ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 15:53       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 16:07       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 16:36         ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 17:21           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-22 18:18             ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 18:02         ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:08           ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:30             ` Rik van Riel
2002-05-22 18:40               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:48               ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 18:34             ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
2002-05-22 18:27               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 20:30             ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? William Lee Irwin III
2002-05-22 21:18               ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 21:23                 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 22:35                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-05-22 22:44                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-28  2:08                 ` Wim Coekaerts
2002-05-31 20:39                   ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2002-05-23 14:16             ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-23 17:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-23 19:34                 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-05-23 19:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-22 18:38           ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 17:50       ` Alan Cox
2002-05-22 17:54         ` J Sloan
2002-05-22 18:22           ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines Alan Cox
2002-05-22 22:14             ` J Sloan
2002-05-22 18:24         ` Have the 2.4 kernel memory management problems on large machines been fixed? Martin J. Bligh
2002-05-22 22:05           ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-22 14:29 Alastair Stevens
     [not found] <E17AaR0-0002QM-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205221048570.23621-100000@penguin.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-05-22 20:23   ` Andi Kleen
2002-05-22 20:58     ` Linus Torvalds
2002-05-23 12:40       ` Mike Jagdis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020531203911.GS1172@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=Martin.Bligh@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=wim.coekaerts@oracle.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=znmeb@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox