From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnu.org>
To: andersen@codepoet.org, karim@opersys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 10:56:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020603105624.A27896@morgana.systemy.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020603084606.GA15986@codepoet.org>
> What is the software patent outlook for this approach look like?
To me this looks definitely clear of the FMSLabs patent, since RT
and non-RT live side by side, not on a master-slave relationship.
/alessandro
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-03 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 8:35 [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 8:46 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 8:56 ` Alessandro Rubini [this message]
2002-06-03 9:14 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 9:52 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:05 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 10:12 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 10:33 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:38 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 11:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-03 9:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-04 19:29 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 2:40 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 13:51 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 14:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 15:37 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 17:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 18:06 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 18:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 19:13 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 19:40 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 21:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 21:22 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 21:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 8:52 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 10:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 14:03 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 16:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-06 8:34 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-08 13:50 ` john slee
2002-06-08 13:59 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-06 21:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-07 1:35 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 2:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 2:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 10:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-05 9:41 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-06-05 18:20 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 3:56 ` J Sloan
2002-06-05 4:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 7:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-05 11:15 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 12:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 11:11 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 16:55 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-04 16:10 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-04 19:59 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 21:53 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-05 4:00 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-05 9:24 Martin.Knoblauch
2002-06-05 19:01 Paul Zimmerman
2002-06-05 19:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 20:17 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020603105624.A27896@morgana.systemy.it \
--to=rubini@gnu.org \
--cc=andersen@codepoet.org \
--cc=karim@opersys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox