From: Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>
To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Cc: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>,
Alexander.Riesen@synopsys.com,
kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, release 3.0 is available
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 14:13:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020605141325.B23183@mark.mielke.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17931.1023231335@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <200206050224.WAA00121@mail.reutershealth.com>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 10:25:20PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> Keith Owens scripsit:
> > In order to do separate source and object correctly, kbuild 2.5
> > enforces the rule that #include "" comes from the local directory,
> > #include <> comes from the include path. include/linux/zlib.h
> > incorrectly does #include "zconf.h" instead of #include <linux/zconf.h>,
> > breaking the rules.
> This is not the standard gcc behavior, however; quoted-includes
> can come from the include path, although the current directory
> is searched first. The purpose of <>-includes is to suppress
> searching the current directory.
It raises the question 'who not always use #include "..."'?
In the case of a tool that generates dependencies for a source file,
the difference is sensibility.
In other cases, it is just common sense.
mark
--
mark@mielke.cc/markm@ncf.ca/markm@nortelnetworks.com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-05 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 2:35 Announce: Kernel Build for 2.5, release 3.0 is available Keith Owens
2002-06-03 5:31 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-03 19:22 ` [kbuild-devel] " Thomas Duffy
2002-06-03 19:31 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-03 19:58 ` Thomas Duffy
2002-06-03 20:06 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-03 21:12 ` Thomas Duffy
2002-06-04 0:19 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-04 0:29 ` Thomas Duffy
2002-06-04 4:53 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-04 9:16 ` Alex Riesen
2002-06-04 22:55 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-05 2:25 ` [kbuild-devel] " John Cowan
2002-06-05 2:38 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-05 18:13 ` Mark Mielke [this message]
2002-06-05 13:19 ` Alex Riesen
2002-06-04 13:59 ` [kbuild-devel] " Arnd Bergmann
2002-06-05 13:53 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-07 8:49 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-12 13:54 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-12 20:55 ` [kbuild-devel] " Thomas Duffy
2002-06-13 0:15 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020605141325.B23183@mark.mielke.cc \
--to=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
--cc=Alexander.Riesen@synopsys.com \
--cc=jcowan@reutershealth.com \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox