* [PATCH] Call for testers - fixed RAID5 XOR functions
@ 2002-06-05 13:38 Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2002-06-05 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
While porting xor.h to x86-64 I noticed that the accelerated RAID-5 XOR
functions for i386 used incorrect inline assembly. The were clobbering
upto 7 registers without gcc telling it. It is pure luck that it worked
so far, although I'm dubious about it for the versions with 4 and 5 inputs
(has that been really tested? - they clobber 5 or 6 registers and unless it
was pure luck that the caller had some dead registers in one particular
compiler output it must have caused data corruptions)
I unfortunately don't have a RAID-5 so I cannot test. From visual inspection
the new assembly seems to be correct. I would be grateful if someone with
RAID-5 could test it by doing some writes and then removing one disk and
testing recovery. Best would be tests with 3,4,5,6 disks, but only specific
cases will do also.
I did also align the XMM saves on 16 bytes to save a few cycles.
Here is the patch for 2.4.19pre9 (but should apply to most 2.4 and 2.5)
-Andi
--- linux-2.4.19pre9/include/asm-i386/xor.h Fri Sep 14 23:25:21 2001
+++ linux-2.4.19pre9-work/include/asm-i386/xor.h Wed Jun 5 15:06:40 2002
@@ -76,9 +76,9 @@
" addl $128, %2 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2)
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2)
+ :
: "memory");
FPU_RESTORE;
@@ -126,9 +126,9 @@
" addl $128, %3 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2), "r" (p3)
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2), "+r" (p3)
+ :
: "memory");
FPU_RESTORE;
@@ -181,14 +181,15 @@
" addl $128, %4 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2), "r" (p3), "r" (p4)
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2), "+r" (p3), "+r" (p4)
+ :
: "memory");
FPU_RESTORE;
}
+
static void
xor_pII_mmx_5(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *p1, unsigned long *p2,
unsigned long *p3, unsigned long *p4, unsigned long *p5)
@@ -198,7 +199,11 @@
FPU_SAVE;
+ /* need to save/restore p4/p5 manually otherwise gcc's 10 argument
+ limit gets exceeded (+ counts as two arguments) */
__asm__ __volatile__ (
+ " pushl %4\n"
+ " pushl %5\n"
#undef BLOCK
#define BLOCK(i) \
LD(i,0) \
@@ -241,9 +246,11 @@
" addl $128, %5 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "g" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2), "r" (p3), "r" (p4), "r" (p5)
+ " popl %5\n"
+ " popl %4\n"
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2), "+r" (p3)
+ : "r" (p4), "r" (p5)
: "memory");
FPU_RESTORE;
@@ -297,9 +304,9 @@
" addl $64, %2 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2)
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2)
+ :
: "memory");
FPU_RESTORE;
@@ -355,9 +362,9 @@
" addl $64, %3 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2), "r" (p3)
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2), "+r" (p3)
+ :
: "memory" );
FPU_RESTORE;
@@ -422,9 +429,9 @@
" addl $64, %4 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2), "r" (p3), "r" (p4)
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2), "+r" (p3), "+r" (p4)
+ :
: "memory");
FPU_RESTORE;
@@ -439,7 +446,10 @@
FPU_SAVE;
+ /* need to save p4/p5 manually to not exceed gcc's 10 argument limit */
__asm__ __volatile__ (
+ " pushl %4\n"
+ " pushl %5\n"
" .align 32,0x90 ;\n"
" 1: ;\n"
" movq (%1), %%mm0 ;\n"
@@ -498,9 +508,11 @@
" addl $64, %5 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "g" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2), "r" (p3), "r" (p4), "r" (p5)
+ " popl %5\n"
+ " popl %4\n"
+ : "+g" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2), "+r" (p3)
+ : "r" (p4), "r" (p5)
: "memory");
FPU_RESTORE;
@@ -554,6 +566,8 @@
: "r" (cr0), "r" (xmm_save) \
: "memory")
+#define ALIGN16 __attribute__((aligned(16)))
+
#define OFFS(x) "16*("#x")"
#define PF_OFFS(x) "256+16*("#x")"
#define PF0(x) " prefetchnta "PF_OFFS(x)"(%1) ;\n"
@@ -575,7 +589,7 @@
xor_sse_2(unsigned long bytes, unsigned long *p1, unsigned long *p2)
{
unsigned long lines = bytes >> 8;
- char xmm_save[16*4];
+ char xmm_save[16*4] ALIGN16;
int cr0;
XMMS_SAVE;
@@ -616,9 +630,9 @@
" addl $256, %2 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2)
:
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2)
: "memory");
XMMS_RESTORE;
@@ -629,7 +643,7 @@
unsigned long *p3)
{
unsigned long lines = bytes >> 8;
- char xmm_save[16*4];
+ char xmm_save[16*4] ALIGN16;
int cr0;
XMMS_SAVE;
@@ -677,9 +691,9 @@
" addl $256, %3 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r"(p2), "+r"(p3)
:
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r"(p2), "r"(p3)
: "memory" );
XMMS_RESTORE;
@@ -690,7 +704,7 @@
unsigned long *p3, unsigned long *p4)
{
unsigned long lines = bytes >> 8;
- char xmm_save[16*4];
+ char xmm_save[16*4] ALIGN16;
int cr0;
XMMS_SAVE;
@@ -745,9 +759,9 @@
" addl $256, %4 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2), "+r" (p3), "+r" (p4)
:
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2), "r" (p3), "r" (p4)
: "memory" );
XMMS_RESTORE;
@@ -758,12 +772,15 @@
unsigned long *p3, unsigned long *p4, unsigned long *p5)
{
unsigned long lines = bytes >> 8;
- char xmm_save[16*4];
+ char xmm_save[16*4] ALIGN16;
int cr0;
XMMS_SAVE;
+ /* need to save p4/p5 manually to not exceed gcc's 10 argument limit */
__asm__ __volatile__ (
+ " pushl %4\n"
+ " pushl %5\n"
#undef BLOCK
#define BLOCK(i) \
PF1(i) \
@@ -820,9 +837,11 @@
" addl $256, %5 ;\n"
" decl %0 ;\n"
" jnz 1b ;\n"
- :
- : "r" (lines),
- "r" (p1), "r" (p2), "r" (p3), "r" (p4), "r" (p5)
+ " popl %5\n"
+ " popl %4\n"
+ : "+r" (lines),
+ "+r" (p1), "+r" (p2), "+r" (p3)
+ : "r" (p4), "r" (p5)
: "memory");
XMMS_RESTORE;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2002-06-05 13:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-06-05 13:38 [PATCH] Call for testers - fixed RAID5 XOR functions Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox