From: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
To: Steve Lord <lord@sgi.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:31:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020605183152.H4697@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020604225539.F9111@redhat.com> <1023315323.17160.522.camel@jen.americas.sgi.com>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 05:15:23PM -0500, Steve Lord wrote:
> Just what are the tasks you normally run - and how many code
> paths do you think there are out there which you do not run. XFS
> might get a bit stack hungry in places, we try to keep it down,
> but when you get into file system land things can stack up quickly:
You already lose in that case today, as multiple irqs may come in
from devices and eat up the stack. The whole thing that led me down
this line is seeing it happen in real life. What remains to be done
is to write an automated stack depth checker based on possible call
chains that will calculate the maximum possible stack depth. I've
already got scripts for dumping the top stack users, it's a matter
of writing code that can show us the possible call chains.
-ben
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-05 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-05 2:55 [RFC] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86 Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 15:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-05 18:43 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-05 21:07 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 22:15 ` Steve Lord
2002-06-05 22:31 ` Benjamin LaHaise [this message]
2002-06-05 23:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-06 0:24 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-06 1:15 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-02 15:52 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-09 18:50 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-06 1:42 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-06 2:30 ` Stephen Lord
[not found] <20020604225539.F9111@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206050820100.2941-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020605144357.A4697@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-06-05 20:40 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-05 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-06 13:32 Ulrich Weigand
[not found] <mailman.1023370621.16639.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-06-06 17:37 ` Pete Zaitcev
2002-06-07 1:06 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-06 19:24 Ulrich Weigand
[not found] <OF70FD985F.A9C66B00-ONC1256BD0.0069C993@de.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-06-06 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-06 20:27 ` David Mosberger
2002-06-07 11:28 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-06 20:55 Ulrich Weigand
2002-06-06 21:19 ` David Mosberger
2002-06-06 22:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-07 0:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020605183152.H4697@redhat.com \
--to=bcrl@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lord@sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox