From: "Roger W. Brown" <bregor@anusf.anu.edu.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: axobe@suse.de, akpm@zip.com.au
Subject: Re: Definition conflict in 2.4.19-pre?? code
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:03:38 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206052203.38253.bregor@sf.anu.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200206051736.45920.bregor@sf.anu.edu.au> <20020605100229.GX1105@suse.de>
( Original message deleted )
>
> Your kernel tree must be corrupted, there's no such change in later
> 2.4.19-pre. pre10 still uses two request wait queues.
Yes indeed !! My patch program trips and falls whenever it encounters the
line: "\ No newline at end of file" I hadn't noticed. Sorry.
--
Roger Brown
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-05 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-05 7:36 Definition conflict in 2.4.19-pre?? code Roger W. Brown
2002-06-05 10:02 ` Jens Axboe
2002-06-05 12:03 ` Roger W. Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200206052203.38253.bregor@sf.anu.edu.au \
--to=bregor@anusf.anu.edu.au \
--cc=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=axobe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox