From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: zaitcev@redhat.com
Cc: Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 18:06:33 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020606.180633.05602904.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200206061737.g56Hbws24655@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
From: Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:37:58 -0400
>[...]
> Of course, the situation is particularly bad on s390, because every
> function call needs at least 96 bytes on the stack (due to the register
> save areas required by our ABI).
How is this different from sparc64?
Sparc64 even eats 192 bytes per function call, minimum. Sibling call
optimization in current GCC helps, but it is still an issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-07 1:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.1023370621.16639.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2002-06-06 17:37 ` [RFC] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86 Pete Zaitcev
2002-06-07 1:06 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-06-06 20:55 Ulrich Weigand
2002-06-06 21:19 ` David Mosberger
2002-06-06 22:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-06-07 0:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
[not found] <OF70FD985F.A9C66B00-ONC1256BD0.0069C993@de.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-06-06 19:49 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-06 20:27 ` David Mosberger
2002-06-07 11:28 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-06 19:24 Ulrich Weigand
2002-06-06 13:32 Ulrich Weigand
[not found] <20020604225539.F9111@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206050820100.2941-100000@home.transmeta.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20020605144357.A4697@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2002-06-05 20:40 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-05 20:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-05 2:55 Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 15:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-05 18:43 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-06-05 21:07 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 22:15 ` Steve Lord
2002-06-05 22:31 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-05 23:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-06 0:24 ` Larry McVoy
2002-06-06 1:15 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-02 15:52 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-09 18:50 ` Andi Kleen
2002-06-06 1:42 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-06-06 2:30 ` Stephen Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020606.180633.05602904.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox