* [ANNOUNCE] atapci 0.51
@ 2002-05-31 12:35 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-01 2:55 ` Thomas Zimmerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2002-05-31 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Roberto Nibali, dalecki
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > user-space tool to get info from ATA pci chipsets
> > (rewritten ide-info)
> > has all functionality of latest 2.5.x/2.4.x plus
> > - getting info from multiple identical cards
> > - simulation of ATA timings with changed PCI bus speed
>
> I don't know, either I'm too dumb to use it or there is still quite some
> code missing.
Ok, by mistake I made it 2.5.19 dependant (to compile), it is fixed now.
I've just copied pci_ids.h and errno-base.h from kernel to atapci/ dir.
So 0.51 version is here:
http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
changelog:
- make it kernel version independent
- add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
- minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
--
bkz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] atapci 0.51
2002-05-31 12:35 [ANNOUNCE] atapci 0.51 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2002-06-01 2:55 ` Thomas Zimmerman
2002-06-05 16:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Zimmerman @ 2002-06-01 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 401 bytes --]
On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
[snip]
> So 0.51 version is here:
> http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
>
> changelog:
> - make it kernel version independent
> - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
> - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
>
> --
> bkz
Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with "lspci" and
"lsisa"?
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] atapci 0.51
2002-06-01 2:55 ` Thomas Zimmerman
@ 2002-06-05 16:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-06 2:55 ` Mike Fedyk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2002-06-05 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Zimmerman; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
> On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> [snip]
> > So 0.51 version is here:
> > http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
> >
> > changelog:
> > - make it kernel version independent
> > - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
> > - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
> >
> > --
> > bkz
>
> Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with "lspci" and
> "lsisa"?
>
> Thomas
>
No, it is only for PCI chipsets.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] atapci 0.51
2002-06-05 16:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2002-06-06 2:55 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-06-06 7:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Fedyk @ 2002-06-06 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz; +Cc: Thomas Zimmerman, linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 31 May 2002, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > So 0.51 version is here:
> > > http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > changelog:
> > > - make it kernel version independent
> > > - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
> > > - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
> > >
> > > --
> > > bkz
> >
> > Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with "lspci" and
> > "lsisa"?
> >
> > Thomas
> >
>
> No, it is only for PCI chipsets.
I think he meant to follow the naming convention set by lspci and lsisa.
What do you think now?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] atapci 0.51
2002-06-06 7:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
@ 2002-06-06 7:03 ` Martin Dalecki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Martin Dalecki @ 2002-06-06 7:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anton Altaparmakov
Cc: Mike Fedyk, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Thomas Zimmerman,
linux-kernel
Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> At 03:55 06/06/02, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, 31 May 2002, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> > > [snip]
>> > > > So 0.51 version is here:
>> > > > http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
>> > > >
>> > > > changelog:
>> > > > - make it kernel version independent
>> > > > - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
>> > > > - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > bkz
>> > >
>> > > Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with
>> "lspci" and
>> > > "lsisa"?
>> > >
>> > > Thomas
>> > >
>> >
>> > No, it is only for PCI chipsets.
>>
>> I think he meant to follow the naming convention set by lspci and lsisa.
>> What do you think now?
>
>
> Well the comment that it only applies to pci chipsets still applies. A
> compromise would be lsatapci I guess...
Well the best thing would be to integrate it with hdparm and ide-smart anyway...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] atapci 0.51
2002-06-06 2:55 ` Mike Fedyk
@ 2002-06-06 7:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-06 7:03 ` Martin Dalecki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Anton Altaparmakov @ 2002-06-06 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Fedyk; +Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Thomas Zimmerman, linux-kernel
At 03:55 06/06/02, Mike Fedyk wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 06:21:47PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 31 May 2002, Thomas Zimmerman wrote:
> >
> > > On 31-May 02:35, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > [snip]
> > > > So 0.51 version is here:
> > > > http://home.elka.pw.edu.pl/~bzolnier/atapci/atapci-0.51.tar.bz2
> > > >
> > > > changelog:
> > > > - make it kernel version independent
> > > > - add '-s' strip flag to CFLAGS
> > > > - minor cosmetics by Roberto Nibali
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > bkz
> > >
> > > Just a nit, but wouldn't the name "lsata" fit in better with "lspci" and
> > > "lsisa"?
> > >
> > > Thomas
> > >
> >
> > No, it is only for PCI chipsets.
>
>I think he meant to follow the naming convention set by lspci and lsisa.
>What do you think now?
Well the comment that it only applies to pci chipsets still applies. A
compromise would be lsatapci I guess...
Anton
--
"I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-06-06 8:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-31 12:35 [ANNOUNCE] atapci 0.51 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-01 2:55 ` Thomas Zimmerman
2002-06-05 16:21 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2002-06-06 2:55 ` Mike Fedyk
2002-06-06 7:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-06-06 7:03 ` Martin Dalecki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox