Re: [RFC] 4KB stack + irq stack for x86

[William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>]

<Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com> said:
Uli> So in the case of 8K page size, you need an order-2 allocation
Uli> for the stack, right?  How do you handle failures due to
Uli> fragmentation?

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:19:02PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote:
> We don't do anything special.  I'm not sure what the fragmentation
> statistics look like on machines with 1+GB memory; it's something I
> have been wondering about and hoping to look into at some point (if
> someone has done that already, I'd love to see the results). In
> practice, every ia64 linux distro as of today ships with 16KB page
> size, so you only get order-1 allocations for stacks.

I've been collecting information on this as well, as I've been
maintaining a patch to support deferred coalescing in the page-level
allocator. Martin Bligh contributed the code to collect some
fragmentation statistics for that patch, which was originally written
for mainline 2.4. It's slightly less expensive in lazy_buddy, as the
algorithm requires some accounting anyway, but some other statistics
besides population counts for various block sizes might also be useful
to track here. I'm holding off until I read up on seq_file() and convert
the /proc/ reporting over to it before the next release of it, though I
do have more current diffs than I've announced. I wouldn't mind at all
hearing from those who have more stringent fragmentation requirements.

Cheers,
Bill