From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: roland@topspin.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 22:29:03 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020608.222903.122223122.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52d6v19r9n.fsf@topspin.com>
From: Roland Dreier <roland@topspin.com>
Date: 08 Jun 2002 18:26:12 -0700
Just to make sure I'm reading this correctly, you're saying that as
long as a buffer is OK for DMA, it should be OK to use a
sub-cache-line chunk as a DMA buffer via pci_map_single(), and
accessing the rest of the cache line should be OK at any time before,
during and after the DMA.
Yes.
David> This means what MIPS is doing is wrong. For partial
David> cacheline bits it can't do the invalidate thing.
If I understand you, this means non-cache-coherent PPC is wrong as
well -- pci_map_single() goes through consistent_sync() and turns
into:
case PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE: /* invalidate only */
invalidate_dcache_range(start, end);
break;
What alternate implementation are you proposing?
For non-cacheline aligned chunks in the range "start" to "end" you
must perform a cache writeback and invalidate. To preserve the data
outside of the DMA range.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-09 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-08 20:38 PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch Roland Dreier
2002-06-08 13:58 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-06-09 0:52 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-08 23:03 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 0:40 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-09 0:53 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 1:26 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-09 5:29 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2002-06-09 6:16 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 16:03 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 14:04 ` David Woodhouse
2002-06-09 6:45 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 4:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 10:00 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 10:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 9:51 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-09 10:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-10 4:27 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 15:59 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 17:03 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:22 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 17:29 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:39 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 19:03 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 19:14 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 19:21 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 19:26 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:57 ` Russell King
2002-06-10 17:28 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 18:07 ` William Jhun
2002-06-10 18:29 ` William Jhun
2002-06-10 18:33 ` Mark Zealey
2002-06-10 18:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 3:10 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:04 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:16 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-11 4:24 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:39 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 6:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 6:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 7:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 7:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 7:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 8:07 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 8:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 12:06 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 12:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 14:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-14 4:14 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 18:26 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 17:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 12:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 20:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 12:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 23:00 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 23:56 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-12 0:09 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 15:57 ` William Jhun
2002-06-12 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-12 20:16 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 11:47 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 12:08 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-14 4:41 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 16:09 ` William Jhun
2002-06-09 1:30 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 5:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 6:33 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 6:50 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-09 6:57 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 7:15 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-09 8:48 ` Russell King
2002-06-09 15:42 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 23:26 ` Oliver Neukum
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-11 5:31 David Brownell
2002-06-11 5:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 15:12 ` David Brownell
2002-06-11 15:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-12 3:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 17:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 9:42 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 14:14 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 15:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 18:44 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-12 19:13 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 19:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-12 22:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 23:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-13 4:57 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 22:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-13 5:13 ` David Brownell
2002-06-13 9:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 22:50 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 6:25 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 6:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 7:06 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 9:22 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020608.222903.122223122.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox