From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: <paulus@samba.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: <roland@topspin.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 12:54:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020609105448.3898@smtp.wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15619.9534.521209.93822@nanango.paulus.ozlabs.org>
>
>Now at this point the driver calls pci_unmap_single or whatever. What
>is pci_unmap_single to do? If it does nothing, or does a writeback,
>we lose the DMA data. If it does an invalidate we lose the value
>written to X. Clearly, neither is correct.
>
>The bottom line is that we can only have one writer to any given cache
>line at a time. If a buffer is being used for DMA from a device to
>memory, the cpu MUST NOT write to any cache line that overlaps the
>buffer.
Note that this typically happen with network drivers, some infos in
the skbuf getting lost when they happen to share a cache line with
the data portion of the skbuf. When writing a driver specific to a
non-coherent CPU, it can be worked around by reserving enough space,
but "generic" PCI drivers are still affected.
On those architectures, the core skbuf alloc routines should probably
make sure the data portion don't share a cache line with other
informations.
Ben.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-09 10:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-08 20:38 PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch Roland Dreier
2002-06-08 13:58 ` Anton Blanchard
2002-06-09 0:52 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-08 23:03 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 0:40 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-09 0:53 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 1:26 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-09 5:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 6:16 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 16:03 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 14:04 ` David Woodhouse
2002-06-09 6:45 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 4:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 10:00 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 10:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 9:51 ` Paul Mackerras
2002-06-09 10:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2002-06-10 4:27 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-10 15:59 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 17:03 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:22 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 17:29 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:39 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-10 19:03 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 19:14 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 19:21 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 19:26 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-10 17:57 ` Russell King
2002-06-10 17:28 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-10 18:07 ` William Jhun
2002-06-10 18:29 ` William Jhun
2002-06-10 18:33 ` Mark Zealey
2002-06-10 18:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 3:10 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:04 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:16 ` Brad Hards
2002-06-11 4:24 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:21 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 4:39 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 4:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 6:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 6:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 7:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 7:36 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 7:43 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 8:07 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 8:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 12:06 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 12:04 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 14:23 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-14 4:14 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 18:26 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-11 17:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 12:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-11 20:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 12:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 23:00 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 23:56 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-12 0:09 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-11 15:57 ` William Jhun
2002-06-12 9:06 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-12 20:16 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 11:47 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 12:08 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-14 4:41 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 16:09 ` William Jhun
2002-06-09 1:30 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 5:29 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-09 6:33 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 6:50 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-09 6:57 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 7:15 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-09 8:48 ` Russell King
2002-06-09 15:42 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2002-06-09 23:26 ` Oliver Neukum
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-11 5:31 David Brownell
2002-06-11 5:44 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 15:12 ` David Brownell
2002-06-11 15:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-12 3:25 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-11 17:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 9:42 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 14:14 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 15:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2002-06-12 18:44 ` Roland Dreier
2002-06-12 19:13 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 19:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-12 22:51 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 23:17 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-06-13 4:57 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 22:46 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-13 5:13 ` David Brownell
2002-06-13 9:38 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 22:50 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 6:25 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 6:24 ` David S. Miller
2002-06-12 7:06 ` David Brownell
2002-06-12 9:22 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020609105448.3898@smtp.wanadoo.fr \
--to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=roland@topspin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox